International Photographers Association of Los Angeles 洛杉磯國際攝影家協會

We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved. -Ansel Adams
現在的時間是 週四 3月 28, 2024 4:53 pm

所有顯示的時間為 UTC - 8 小時 [ DST ]




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 3:38 am 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週一 1月 09, 2012 2:33 pm
文章: 1192
agreed. will try again


最後由 Kim Cheung 於 週二 3月 13, 2012 3:10 pm 編輯, 總共編輯了 4 次

回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 10:25 am 
離線
左庶长
左庶长
頭像

註冊時間: 週六 2月 24, 2007 10:16 am
文章: 793
來自: 北京--LA
...........

_________________
北京的。。。Loyal Fans of IPALA

I believe in: unity, serenity, harmony, peace, and longivity.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 2:26 pm 
離線
右更
右更
頭像

註冊時間: 週日 2月 18, 2007 2:19 pm
文章: 1653
说实话您要是不说我还真没看出来来女高音在唱歌。舞台摄影抓表情或体态最重要。抓一些有代表性的动作。
画质不清楚,我估计女高音自己不会太喜欢这张照片。

_________________
Canon 1D X 24-70/F2.8L 70-200/2.8 L IS 580EXII 85/F1.2 L 35mm/F1.4 50mm/F1.4

LX-5

洛杉矶婚礼,婚纱摄影师。
Los Angeles Wedding Photographer
Blog:
http://www.photobyjohnli.com/cn


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 5:52 pm 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週一 1月 09, 2012 2:33 pm
文章: 1192
Thank you, John. I agree totally it's an ugly picture (and thanks Kaja from removing it). I meant to post it as a plead for advise.

The condition was very adverse. The room was very dark but the stage light is on and very orange. The best equipment I have is only a 80-200mm F2.8 Nikon lens, with a Nikon D90. No tripod, no flash allowed. Even with 3200 ISO, s-stop pushed down to 1/30, the picture were all under-exposed and blurry. In desperation, I rested the camera on a counter, set the timer on automatic and take 10 pictures at a time, and f-stop 1/15 (in the hope that it would not be underexposed too much). Even then, I was able to pick out only 1 shot (the ugly picture you saw). If I use a faster shutter (like Mr. Chan advise me to do), I will be seriously underexposed and because of the dominance of the orange color, I was afraid post-processing won't be able to correct the under-exposure.

What should I have done? Use a higher shutter-speed and deal with the under-exposure later? Or just give up and go buy a D4?

Thanks,


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 7:45 pm 
離線
少上造
少上造

註冊時間: 週五 9月 19, 2008 12:18 am
文章: 2669
怎么看不见片子?

_________________
看更多图片:
http://www.photosalonla.org/membergallery.asp?uid=490 网上画廊


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 8:15 pm 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週一 1月 09, 2012 2:33 pm
文章: 1192
frank L6 寫:
怎么看不见片子?


Too ugly. Kaja deleted it!

Here's a sample for another singer. RAW (converted to JPG but otherwise untouched)



No matter what I try, they all come out like this. What should I have done?


最後由 Kim Cheung 於 週五 3月 16, 2012 11:58 pm 編輯, 總共編輯了 1 次

回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 9:39 pm 
離線
右更
右更
頭像

註冊時間: 週日 2月 18, 2007 2:19 pm
文章: 1653
您讲了那么多的客观条件几乎是不可能完成的任务。如果不是非拍不可的话,我会放弃,好好欣赏一下女高音是多么美好的事情阿。

尼康的器材我还真不太了解, 您得问叶老师。

_________________
Canon 1D X 24-70/F2.8L 70-200/2.8 L IS 580EXII 85/F1.2 L 35mm/F1.4 50mm/F1.4

LX-5

洛杉矶婚礼,婚纱摄影师。
Los Angeles Wedding Photographer
Blog:
http://www.photobyjohnli.com/cn


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 10:16 pm 
離線
大上造
大上造
頭像

註冊時間: 週五 7月 11, 2008 10:08 pm
文章: 3441
來自: LA, Ca
Kim Cheung 寫:
Thank you, John. I agree totally it's an ugly picture (and thanks Kaja from removing it). I meant to post it as a plead for advise.

The condition was very adverse. The room was very dark but the stage light is on and very orange. The best equipment I have is only a 80-200mm F2.8 Nikon lens, with a Nikon D90. No tripod, no flash allowed. Even with 3200 ISO, s-stop pushed down to 1/30, the picture were all under-exposed and blurry. In desperation, I rested the camera on a counter, set the timer on automatic and take 10 pictures at a time, and f-stop 1/15 (in the hope that it would not be underexposed too much). Even then, I was able to pick out only 1 shot (the ugly picture you saw). If I use a faster shutter (like Mr. Chan advise me to do), I will be seriously underexposed and because of the dominance of the orange color, I was afraid post-processing won't be able to correct the under-exposure.

What should I have done? Use a higher shutter-speed and deal with the under-exposure later? Or just give up and go buy a D4?

Thanks,

那天你原不是說要我去嗎?

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jyrmao


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 3月 13, 2012 10:35 pm 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週一 1月 09, 2012 2:33 pm
文章: 1192
James Mao 寫:
Kim Cheung 寫:
Thank you, John. I agree totally it's an ugly picture (and thanks Kaja from removing it). I meant to post it as a plead for advise.

The condition was very adverse. The room was very dark but the stage light is on and very orange. The best equipment I have is only a 80-200mm F2.8 Nikon lens, with a Nikon D90. No tripod, no flash allowed. Even with 3200 ISO, s-stop pushed down to 1/30, the picture were all under-exposed and blurry. In desperation, I rested the camera on a counter, set the timer on automatic and take 10 pictures at a time, and f-stop 1/15 (in the hope that it would not be underexposed too much). Even then, I was able to pick out only 1 shot (the ugly picture you saw). If I use a faster shutter (like Mr. Chan advise me to do), I will be seriously underexposed and because of the dominance of the orange color, I was afraid post-processing won't be able to correct the under-exposure.

What should I have done? Use a higher shutter-speed and deal with the under-exposure later? Or just give up and go buy a D4?

Thanks,

那天你原不是說要我去嗎?


Sorry. At first, I was told she wasn't to sing. So I didn't want to bother you. Then they were late and decided to compensate for it by entertaining us with couple of songs. I have never heard her sing and I wanted to try my hands on recording the moment. But that damn orange light,,,


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC - 8 小時 [ DST ]


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: 沒有註冊用戶 和 12 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯文章
不能 在這個版面刪除文章
不能 在這個版面上傳附加檔案

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
POWERED_BY
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作